What is a microservice chassis?

I came across this a while back and noticed that many companies said they are building microservices but when I asked a bit more questions. None of the companies were actually using this method. But why? Why is no one investing just a bit more time to do it actually the correct way? It helps you speed up development in such a way.

Before we dive into the code examples, let’s take a moment to define what we mean by a microservice chassis. A microservice chassis is essentially a set of libraries, tools, and conventions that help you build microservices more easily and consistently. It provides a set of guidelines and best practices that can help you avoid common pitfalls and build more robust and scalable systems.

One of the key features of a microservice chassis is the use of a lightweight, language-agnostic protocol for communication between services. This could be something like REST, gRPC, or GraphQL, depending on your specific requirements. By standardizing on a common protocol, you can more easily build and manage complex systems that are composed of many different services.

Why use a microservice chassis?

There are several benefits to using a microservice chassis. First, it provides a consistent and repeatable framework for building microservices, which can help you avoid reinventing the wheel every time you start a new project. This can help you save time and effort, and focus on the unique aspects of your application.

Second, a microservice chassis can help you build more scalable and fault-tolerant systems. By standardizing on a common protocol and using well-defined APIs, you can more easily isolate and contain issues that may arise, and replace or upgrade individual services without affecting the rest of the system.

Finally, a microservice chassis can help you build more maintainable systems. By using a consistent set of tools and conventions, you can more easily onboard new developers, and make changes to the system without introducing unexpected side effects.

Writing a microservice chassis in TypeScript

Now that we’ve defined what a microservice chassis is and why it’s useful, let’s dive into some code examples. We’ll be using Node.js and the popular Express web framework to build our microservices. First, we’ll define a simple “ping” endpoint that can be used to test whether our service is up and running. We’ll start by creating a new TypeScript file called “app.ts”, and adding the following code:

import express, { Request, Response } from 'express'

const app = express();

app.get('/ping', (req: Request, res: Response) => {
  res.status(200).send('pong');
});

const port = process.env.PORT || 3000;

app.listen(port, () => {
  console.log(`Server listening on port ${port}`);
});;

This code defines a simple Express app that listens for requests on the /ping endpoint and returns a “pong” response. We’re using TypeScript to define the types of the “req” and “res” parameters, which helps us catch errors early and write more maintainable code.

Next, we’ll add some more functionality to our microservice. Let’s say we want to expose a “users” endpoint that allows clients to retrieve information about our users. We’ll start by creating a new TypeScript file called “users.ts”, and adding the following code:

import express, { Request, Response } from 'express'

const app = express();

app.get('/users/:userId', (req: Request, res: Response);

One of the main advantages of a microservices architecture is that it allows for greater scalability than a traditional monolithic architecture. This is because each service can be scaled independently, based on its own specific requirements. For example, if one service is experiencing heavy traffic, it can be scaled up without affecting other services in the system. This helps ensure that the system can handle large volumes of traffic and continue to provide a responsive user experience.

In order to build microservices, it can be helpful to have a microservice chassis — a set of tools and frameworks that provide a foundation for building and deploying microservices. One popular microservice chassis is called Seneca, which is built in Node.js and supports a variety of transport mechanisms.

Here’s an example of how to build a simple Seneca microservice in TypeScript:

import Seneca from "seneca"

// Create a Seneca instance
const seneca = Seneca();

// Define a pattern for a "hello" command
seneca.add({ cmd: "hello" }, (msg, reply) => {
  const name = msg.name || "world";
  reply(null, { message: `Hello, ${name}!` });
});

// Start the service
seneca.listen({ port: 3000 });;

In this example, we define a Seneca instance and add a pattern for a “hello” command. When the service receives a message with the “hello” command, it responds with a personalized greeting. We then start the service by calling the listen method and specifying the port to listen on.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a microservices architecture can provide a number of benefits, including improved scalability, reliability, and maintainability. By breaking up a large application into smaller, independent services, we can create a more flexible and responsive system that can handle large volumes of traffic and deliver a better user experience. And by using TypeScript and a microservice chassis like Seneca, we can build and deploy microservices more easily and with greater confidence.

I hope I was able to contribute a very tiny bit to someone's Knowledge out there. Microservices are so sexy and often wrongly implemented. The usage of a chassis will help you move faster, simply because you avoid repetitive work and every new developer could potentially start right away.

Want to share your knowledge? Join the LIGroup: https://www.linkedin.com/groups/12785690/

Follow me on LinkedIn:

https://www.linkedin.com/comm/mynetwork/discovery-see-all?usecase=PEOPLE_FOLLOWS&followMember=dirkmeij

#development #microservices #microservicesarchitecture #microservice #typescript #javascript #javascriptdeveloper #javascriptdevelopers #microservicechassis #architecturedesign #typescripttip #javascripttip